Finally, Winnicott suggested that there is a ``normal'' false self system, manifest as ordinary politeness. Is this the case? I do not think so. There can never be an exact equivalence between self, as interior life, and identity or who-one-is-for-others. One has to do largely with thoughts, feelings, images, whereas the other has to do with behavior. The translation from one to the other cannot produce a replica. Nevertheless, where the inner zone of thought and feeling is linked and coordinated with the outer one of behavior, then falseness is not experienced. Where, however, the social manner is based on the desire for acceptance by a particular group, so that behavior loses touch with inner experience, a false self emerges, which consists of a fashionable facade. It is a variant of the system of compliance.